RSS

Category Archives: Finance

Don’t Blame Zuckerberg For Investing On Hype

Facebook is simply this. A free sign up, free usage, social networking and online gaming site. Some people would like to call it a technology company. Yet, its money isn’t made from technology. The vast majority of their money is made through selling ad space on their popular platform. Big companies pay millions of dollars on the “HOPE,” “PRAYER,” and “OPPORTUNITY” that one of Facebook’s 900 million users world wide will click on their ad, come to their site and purchase a product. I’ve been using the internet for about 20 years and I think I may have bought 1 thing through clicking on an ad from a website.

When Facebook announced it’s IPO back in January, people were screaming that hey, it’s the next Google. I too, who missed on the Google IPO and the Apple turnaround when the stock was trading at $2 didn’t want to miss on the next potentially monstrous stock market success of Facebook. That’s what Facebook could have been and was thought to be. A behemoth making billions of dollars in revenue, and billions of dollars in net income and growing in excess of 5% year after year. What’s not to like about that? Blinded by the hopes for riches I said nothing, and guaranteed myself that I’d buy at least 10 shares at the expected price of $45 dollars. Now Zuckerberg’s being sued for supposedly dumping shares.

So what went wrong on May 18, 2012 when the stock debuted at $38 and rocketed up to $45 when the market finally opened. Well aside from the complete screw up of the NASDAQ system, I say a whopping nothing! The fact is, insiders always have a leg up on the investment community because they’re called insiders for a reason. They’re already privy to more information than the average retail investor. Sure, Facebook’s underwriters bought shares to keep the price where they wanted it, but large corporations or people with big pockets do this daily on the stock market. It’s called pump and dump. They drop in $250M and watch the volume increase and then you buy on speculation…and then they sell, laughing at you all the way to the bank. And that’s what everyone else did. They bought on speculation thinking that Facebook was going to be the next Google. Yeah, the company that opened at $85 and has since shot up to over $700 per share and is currently sitting at about $576 a share. Even if you weren’t an insider and Facebook’s stock chart looked anything remotely close to Google’s, you’d have made a nice penny.

Then wherein does the major difference lie that makes Google a better investment than Facebook at the time of the Facebook IPO? Well remember I said Facebook announced it’s IPO in January? Yes. Ok, so they didn’t go public until about 6 months later. Thus, you can imagine with all the hype building there were some other reports that had quite a few naysayers. Here are a few things that stuck out and made me realize that Facebook wasn’t anything close to Google. These are the reasons I decided to increase my position in a dividend paying utility company vs the long shot on the Facebook IPO.

1. Both Google and Facebook makes billions from advertising. But Google’s AdSense ad business is more profitable at the moment. So much so that even you could make money on your website running AdSense ads. Yes Google will cut you a check, how big is dependent on your website’s traffic and click through rate.

2. Google has products and Facebook does not. If you have a smartphone that’s not an iPhone or a Blackberry, then you’re probably running some version of the Android smartphone software. Yup, that’s made by Google. Google actually has its own phones too that run Android. Then there’s the Google marketplace for all Android smartphones on all the major service providers. Are you seeing this picture clearer?

3. People don’t use Facebook to find out useful information like where to get the best deal on a vacuum cleaner, they Google it. Yeah, the company’s name is now an adjective for “using an internet search engine to get useful information to help you in school, develop your business plan, and find out how.” Us dinosaurs use to use YAHOO!

4. Facebook’s biggest need is the ability to monetize mobile usage. Up until this point they have not. Which means, they’re leaving billions of dollars on the table. There have been dozens of reports floating around the investment and technology community saying that mobile is going to dominate PCs, and do to it what the DVD did to the VCR. In my mind I don’t think so, but hell, who knows. Facebook still doesn’t know how to turn a profit on it and sees it as their biggest need.

5. And perhaps the most glaring is Mark Zuckerberg’s impulse purchase for $1 billion dollars of Instagram. A company that had no revenue at the time, because like Facebook, it is a free platform for people to post pictures and talk. But unlike Facebook, it has no ad business. Zuckerberg made this decision without consulting his shareholders. He did? Yes, because he still has a majority stake in the company so no one can really vote him down on anything.

And to end this painstakingly intelligent article I’ll say this about investing. Insiders will always get rich on IPO’s if they sell because they usually have millions of these little pieces of paper called shares that have no actual value except what people “THINK” they are worth. It’s imagined. On May 18, 2012 Facebook was worth $100 billion because somebody said it was, and then somebody thought it was. It was most certainly not worth $100 billion on paper i.e. financial reports. And since the company was private up until May 18 and didn’t have to file public reports, you weren’t privy to the information insiders would have been privy to. Even the most oblivious insider with just 1 million shares was going to walk away with about $30-$50 million dollars if he sold his stake on IPO day. And the fact that as IPO day approached, some of the biggest insiders i.e. billion dollar companies kept increasing the number of shares they were going to offer to the market. Ding, ding, ding, because they knew the valuation was overinflated. The tried and true tested way to make intelligent investments is to study the companies you want to invest in and make informed decision based on solid financial information and buy at a fair price. So don’t blame Zuckerberg because he did what any other insider would do and sold off some shares. Maybe he had more information than you, but how many times has the stock market tanked since you’ve been born. Exactly. If you were suckered into this ad company that has no other business for even $38 dollars per share, then you’re looking at about a $12 dollar loss since Facebook is trading at $27.40 as we speak.

Be smart…don’t invest on hype and most certainly don’t blame Zuckerberg.

Until next write…

Comment and read my debut novel, The Virgin Surgeon

About these ads
 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Smartphone War Rages On: What Will Google Do If They Acquire Motorola

If you’re anything like me, then you probably own a smartphone (iPhone 4 from the original Motorola Droid) and do everything on it from checking the weather to tracking your stock portfolio. After the death of Steve Jobs (R.I.P.), Apple Inc., released the iPhone 4S rather than the iPhone 5 that everyone had come to expect through all the media speculation. And while many were upset by this new found truth, Apple Inc., sold 4 million iPhone 4S which was probably helped by the phone being available on it’s 3rd service provider, Sprint.

But long before the iPhone 4S hit the market (about 2 months), Google announced plans to buy Motorola Mobility Holdings (the cell phone division of Motorola) for $12.5 billion. There was no surprise that Motorola Mobility’s (MSI) stock price rose by 55% in lieu of the announcement.

Currently Google is the maker of the Android software that many popular touchscreen smartphone devices that came after the iPhone use as its OS. Steve Jobs was quite candid in his opinion of the Android operating system stating that “I will spend my last dying breath if I need to, and I will spend every penny of Apple’s $40 billion in the bank, to right this wrong,” Jobs told Isaacson. “I’m going to destroy Android because it’s a stolen product. I’m willing to go to thermonuclear war on this. They are scared to death because they know they are guilty.”

Apple’s iPhone has been a great product because of the fact that the hardware and software are made by the same company. So the phones seems to work like a charm (in my experience). The touchscreen is very responsive, the user interface is quite intuitive, and since switching from the original Motorola Droid, it has been the better experience for me personally. Even more so, when you get an iPhone, you get an iPhone. So while you may experience better or worse call/3G service on Verizon, ATT, or Sprint; the phone without those needs is essentially the same in every way. Loads of apps, great camera, iPod, and no one can deny that it looks good.

With Android you don’t get the same experience, because all phones using the Android OS are not created equal. From what I’ve read, HTC is the pack leader and the list falls in line under them. And when you get into the various service providers who carry Android operated phones, the difference in quality is immediately apparent. So when Google announced plans to offer $12.5 billion for Motorola Mobility Holdings the media was abuzz and rightfully so.

Motorola was the first company to produce a touchscreen smartphone that could be a real competitor to the iPhone on the Verizon platform running Google’s Android OS. When I bought it, the Motorola Droid was a dream. The touchscreen snapped to apps quickly similar to the iPhone, it was just as intuitive to me, and the experience was first place in my mind only having short moments to test drive my friends’ iPhones. And with the advent of Adobe Flash support a few months later, it actually gave the Droid a leg up in my personal opinion, though I haven’t missed Flash much these days.

Fast forward to today a couple of years after Android hit the market and you’ve got potentially one of the best software companies in Google grabbing one of the first great makers of cell phones in Motorola. I like the media immediately thought, Google’s going to do with Android what Apple did with the iPhone. They’re going to make the phone and the OS, and this is going to tell if this growing company that is Google, can take on the old T-Rex of the tech industry who’s gotten a brand new set of legs and a healthy appetite for swallowing up market share across many platforms since the return of it’s visionary CEO Steve Jobs about a decade ago.

But the hunch that we all have is wrong according to Google. They say they plan to run Google and Motorola Mobility as separate firms as they are today and according to Android boss Andy Rubin ““I don’t think you should consider Google’s acquisition of Motorola as Google entering the hardware business,” Rubin said. “This is going to be an arm’s length thing…Motorola isn’t going to get any special treatment.” Whether you buy that or not is a matter of debate.

Currently the acquisition is being review by the Department of Justice to make sure that the deal wont violate any antitrust laws and is expected to be done by the end of 2011 or early 2012,. But if it goes through, the wheels will begin to turn again in the minds of techies, the media, and certainly investors who will look to make a buck off of this deal. And while the next Google phone, the Samsung Galaxy Nexus that will run Google’s new software, Android Ice Cream Sandwich 4.0, it is noticeably not made by Motorola. But for how long will Google allow it’s platform to be used freely across so many different makers. Surely it is cool for Google to keep the OS open for users to use, but with Apple winning a patent lawsuit against them, and Microsoft being paid by many makers for the use of Android. Obtaining the massive amounts of patents that Motorola owns would be a feather in their cap to help shield them from the lawsuits. And as competition continues to heat up in the smartphone market, why wouldn’t they want to cash in on the kind of sales the Apple has been able to enjoy with the iPhone. Your guess is as good as mine. I’ll be following closely. Feel free to weigh in.

 
2 Comments

Posted by on October 25, 2011 in Finance, Technology

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,881 other followers